Shirky - Here Comes Everybody Exzerpt
Aus Leowiki
(Unterschied zwischen Versionen)
| Version vom 11:44, 28. Jun 2010 (bearbeiten) 91.64.199.167 (Diskussion) ← Zum vorherigen Versionsunterschied |
Version vom 12:18, 28. Jun 2010 (bearbeiten) 91.64.199.167 (Diskussion) Zum nächsten Versionsunterschied → |
||
| Zeile 3: | Zeile 3: | ||
| * Birthday paradox (p. 24): "Imagine you are standing in line with thiry-five other people, and to pass the time, the guy in front of you propses a wager. He's willing to bet fifty dollars that no two people in line share birthday. Would you take that bet? (...) In fact, you should take the bet, since you would have better than 80 percent chance of ''winning'' fifty dollars." | * Birthday paradox (p. 24): "Imagine you are standing in line with thiry-five other people, and to pass the time, the guy in front of you propses a wager. He's willing to bet fifty dollars that no two people in line share birthday. Would you take that bet? (...) In fact, you should take the bet, since you would have better than 80 percent chance of ''winning'' fifty dollars." | ||
| * "A group's complexity grows faster than its size." (see also figur 2-1 on page 27) | * "A group's complexity grows faster than its size." (see also figur 2-1 on page 27) | ||
| - | * | + | * "The groups of photographers were all latent groups, which is to say groups that existed only ''in potentia'', and too much effort would have been required to turn those latent groups into real ones by conventional means. (...) Flickr escaped those problems, not by increasing its managerial oversight over photographers but by abandoning any hope of such oversight in the first place, instead putting in place tools for the self-synchronization of otherwise latent groups." (p. 38-39) |
| + | * "From Sharing to Cooperation to Collective Action" (p. 47) | ||
| + | * "Sharing creates the fewest demands on the participants. Many sharing platforms, such as Flickr, operate in a largely take-it-or-leave-it fashion, which allows for the maximum freedom of the individual to participate while creating the fewest complications of group life. (...) Knowingly sharing your work with others is the simplest way to take advantage of the new social tools. (There are also ways of unknowingly sharing your work, as when Google reads the linking preferences of hundreds of millions of Internet users. These users are helping create a communally available resource, as Flickr useres are, but unlike Flickr, the people whose work Google is aggregating aren't actively choosing to make their contributions." (p. 49) | ||
| + | * "And this is the Tragedy of the Commons: while each person can agree that all would benefit from common restraint, the inentives of the individual are arrayed against that outcome." (p. 52) | ||
| + | * "The essential advantage created by new social tools has been labeled "ridiculously easy group-forming" by the social scientist Seb Paquet." | ||
| == Backlinks == | == Backlinks == | ||
| [[Buchverzeichnis]] | [[Buchverzeichnis]] | ||
Version vom 12:18, 28. Jun 2010
- "One obvious lesson is that new technology enables new kinds of group-forming." (p. 17)
- "In a way, every institution lives in a kind of contradiction: it exists to take advantage of group effort, but some of its resources are drained away by directing that effort." (p. 19)
- Birthday paradox (p. 24): "Imagine you are standing in line with thiry-five other people, and to pass the time, the guy in front of you propses a wager. He's willing to bet fifty dollars that no two people in line share birthday. Would you take that bet? (...) In fact, you should take the bet, since you would have better than 80 percent chance of winning fifty dollars."
- "A group's complexity grows faster than its size." (see also figur 2-1 on page 27)
- "The groups of photographers were all latent groups, which is to say groups that existed only in potentia, and too much effort would have been required to turn those latent groups into real ones by conventional means. (...) Flickr escaped those problems, not by increasing its managerial oversight over photographers but by abandoning any hope of such oversight in the first place, instead putting in place tools for the self-synchronization of otherwise latent groups." (p. 38-39)
- "From Sharing to Cooperation to Collective Action" (p. 47)
- "Sharing creates the fewest demands on the participants. Many sharing platforms, such as Flickr, operate in a largely take-it-or-leave-it fashion, which allows for the maximum freedom of the individual to participate while creating the fewest complications of group life. (...) Knowingly sharing your work with others is the simplest way to take advantage of the new social tools. (There are also ways of unknowingly sharing your work, as when Google reads the linking preferences of hundreds of millions of Internet users. These users are helping create a communally available resource, as Flickr useres are, but unlike Flickr, the people whose work Google is aggregating aren't actively choosing to make their contributions." (p. 49)
- "And this is the Tragedy of the Commons: while each person can agree that all would benefit from common restraint, the inentives of the individual are arrayed against that outcome." (p. 52)
- "The essential advantage created by new social tools has been labeled "ridiculously easy group-forming" by the social scientist Seb Paquet."
