Shirky - Here Comes Everybody Exzerpt
Aus Leowiki
(Unterschied zwischen Versionen)
| Version vom 12:18, 28. Jun 2010 (bearbeiten) 91.64.199.167 (Diskussion) ← Zum vorherigen Versionsunterschied |
Version vom 14:26, 28. Jun 2010 (bearbeiten) 91.64.199.167 (Diskussion) Zum nächsten Versionsunterschied → |
||
| Zeile 7: | Zeile 7: | ||
| * "Sharing creates the fewest demands on the participants. Many sharing platforms, such as Flickr, operate in a largely take-it-or-leave-it fashion, which allows for the maximum freedom of the individual to participate while creating the fewest complications of group life. (...) Knowingly sharing your work with others is the simplest way to take advantage of the new social tools. (There are also ways of unknowingly sharing your work, as when Google reads the linking preferences of hundreds of millions of Internet users. These users are helping create a communally available resource, as Flickr useres are, but unlike Flickr, the people whose work Google is aggregating aren't actively choosing to make their contributions." (p. 49) | * "Sharing creates the fewest demands on the participants. Many sharing platforms, such as Flickr, operate in a largely take-it-or-leave-it fashion, which allows for the maximum freedom of the individual to participate while creating the fewest complications of group life. (...) Knowingly sharing your work with others is the simplest way to take advantage of the new social tools. (There are also ways of unknowingly sharing your work, as when Google reads the linking preferences of hundreds of millions of Internet users. These users are helping create a communally available resource, as Flickr useres are, but unlike Flickr, the people whose work Google is aggregating aren't actively choosing to make their contributions." (p. 49) | ||
| * "And this is the Tragedy of the Commons: while each person can agree that all would benefit from common restraint, the inentives of the individual are arrayed against that outcome." (p. 52) | * "And this is the Tragedy of the Commons: while each person can agree that all would benefit from common restraint, the inentives of the individual are arrayed against that outcome." (p. 52) | ||
| - | * "The essential advantage created by new social tools has been labeled "ridiculously easy group-forming" by the social scientist Seb Paquet." | + | * "The essential advantage created by new social tools has been labeled "ridiculously easy group-forming" by the social scientist Seb Paquet." (p.54, Quelle: p. 329: http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/2002/10/09.html |
| + | * "A profession exists to solve a hard problem, one that requires some sort of specialization." (p. 57) | ||
| + | * "Johannes Gutenberg's invention of movable type in the middle of the century had created a sudden and massive reduction in the difficulty of reproducing a written work. For the first time in history, a copy of a book could be created faster than it could be read." (p. 67) | ||
| + | * "Publish, then filter" (p. 81) | ||
| + | * "Fame is simply an imbalance between inbound and outbound attention, more arrows pointing in than out." (p. 91) | ||
| + | * "Weblogs won't destroy the one-way mirror of fame, and "interactive TV" is an oxymoron (...) Egalitarianism is possible only in small social systems." (p. 93) | ||
| + | * "Filtering as a Tool for Communities of Practice" (p. 97 ff.) | ||
| + | * "Filter-then-publish, whatever its advanteges, rested on a scarcity of media that is a thing of the past. The expansion of social media means that the only working system is publis-then-filter." (p. 98) | ||
| + | * "As the author and activist Cory Doctorow put it, "Conversation is king. Content is just something to talk about."" (p. 99) | ||
| + | * "Etienne Wenger calls a community of practice, a group of people who converse about some shared task in order to get better at it. John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid, in their book The Social Life of Information, put the dilemma this way: "What if HP kney what HP knows?" | ||
| + | * "The basic question "How did you do that?" seems like a simple request for a transfer of information, but when it takes place out in public, it is also a spur to such communities of practice, bridging the former gap between publishing and conversation. (p. 102 f.) | ||
| + | * "Life teaches us that motivations other than getting paid aren't enough to add up to serious work. And now we have to unlearn that lesson, because it is less true with each passing year. (...) Love motivates people to bake a cake and money motivates people to make an encyclopedia. Now, though, we can do big things for love." (p. 103 f.) | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | * | ||
| == Backlinks == | == Backlinks == | ||
| [[Buchverzeichnis]] | [[Buchverzeichnis]] | ||
Version vom 14:26, 28. Jun 2010
- "One obvious lesson is that new technology enables new kinds of group-forming." (p. 17)
- "In a way, every institution lives in a kind of contradiction: it exists to take advantage of group effort, but some of its resources are drained away by directing that effort." (p. 19)
- Birthday paradox (p. 24): "Imagine you are standing in line with thiry-five other people, and to pass the time, the guy in front of you propses a wager. He's willing to bet fifty dollars that no two people in line share birthday. Would you take that bet? (...) In fact, you should take the bet, since you would have better than 80 percent chance of winning fifty dollars."
- "A group's complexity grows faster than its size." (see also figur 2-1 on page 27)
- "The groups of photographers were all latent groups, which is to say groups that existed only in potentia, and too much effort would have been required to turn those latent groups into real ones by conventional means. (...) Flickr escaped those problems, not by increasing its managerial oversight over photographers but by abandoning any hope of such oversight in the first place, instead putting in place tools for the self-synchronization of otherwise latent groups." (p. 38-39)
- "From Sharing to Cooperation to Collective Action" (p. 47)
- "Sharing creates the fewest demands on the participants. Many sharing platforms, such as Flickr, operate in a largely take-it-or-leave-it fashion, which allows for the maximum freedom of the individual to participate while creating the fewest complications of group life. (...) Knowingly sharing your work with others is the simplest way to take advantage of the new social tools. (There are also ways of unknowingly sharing your work, as when Google reads the linking preferences of hundreds of millions of Internet users. These users are helping create a communally available resource, as Flickr useres are, but unlike Flickr, the people whose work Google is aggregating aren't actively choosing to make their contributions." (p. 49)
- "And this is the Tragedy of the Commons: while each person can agree that all would benefit from common restraint, the inentives of the individual are arrayed against that outcome." (p. 52)
- "The essential advantage created by new social tools has been labeled "ridiculously easy group-forming" by the social scientist Seb Paquet." (p.54, Quelle: p. 329: http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/2002/10/09.html
- "A profession exists to solve a hard problem, one that requires some sort of specialization." (p. 57)
- "Johannes Gutenberg's invention of movable type in the middle of the century had created a sudden and massive reduction in the difficulty of reproducing a written work. For the first time in history, a copy of a book could be created faster than it could be read." (p. 67)
- "Publish, then filter" (p. 81)
- "Fame is simply an imbalance between inbound and outbound attention, more arrows pointing in than out." (p. 91)
- "Weblogs won't destroy the one-way mirror of fame, and "interactive TV" is an oxymoron (...) Egalitarianism is possible only in small social systems." (p. 93)
- "Filtering as a Tool for Communities of Practice" (p. 97 ff.)
- "Filter-then-publish, whatever its advanteges, rested on a scarcity of media that is a thing of the past. The expansion of social media means that the only working system is publis-then-filter." (p. 98)
- "As the author and activist Cory Doctorow put it, "Conversation is king. Content is just something to talk about."" (p. 99)
- "Etienne Wenger calls a community of practice, a group of people who converse about some shared task in order to get better at it. John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid, in their book The Social Life of Information, put the dilemma this way: "What if HP kney what HP knows?"
- "The basic question "How did you do that?" seems like a simple request for a transfer of information, but when it takes place out in public, it is also a spur to such communities of practice, bridging the former gap between publishing and conversation. (p. 102 f.)
- "Life teaches us that motivations other than getting paid aren't enough to add up to serious work. And now we have to unlearn that lesson, because it is less true with each passing year. (...) Love motivates people to bake a cake and money motivates people to make an encyclopedia. Now, though, we can do big things for love." (p. 103 f.)
