Metcalfe1994a
Aus Leowiki
| Version vom 08:26, 13. Aug 2007 (bearbeiten) Leonidobusch (Diskussion | Beiträge) ← Zum vorherigen Versionsunterschied |
Aktuelle Version (08:26, 13. Aug 2007) (bearbeiten) Leonidobusch (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
| Zeile 8: | Zeile 8: | ||
| S. 935: | S. 935: | ||
| "Of course, economic systems must be co-ordinated if they are to function [...] [b]ut co-ordination is not equilibirium in a broader sense, the absence of any internal tendency to change. Indeed, the incessant tendency to redefine itself from within is without question a central feature of modern capitalism. This is one reason why the evolutionary economics tradition pays more than lip service to the work of Schumpeter, who with his concept of creative destruction, encapsulated perfectly the inherent restlessness of a capitalist economy." | "Of course, economic systems must be co-ordinated if they are to function [...] [b]ut co-ordination is not equilibirium in a broader sense, the absence of any internal tendency to change. Indeed, the incessant tendency to redefine itself from within is without question a central feature of modern capitalism. This is one reason why the evolutionary economics tradition pays more than lip service to the work of Schumpeter, who with his concept of creative destruction, encapsulated perfectly the inherent restlessness of a capitalist economy." | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Backlinks == | ||
| + | [[Leothek]] | ||
Aktuelle Version
Guter Text zu der Untrennbarkeit von Innovation und Diffusion als wechselseitig aufeinander bezogene Prozesse.
S. 939: "we have the joint phenomena of 'diffusion through learning' and 'learning through diffusion' [...] The final point to make is the openendedness and path dependence of diffusion processes whenever learning effects or other positive feedbacks operate. [...] What is clear, is that the separate analysis of innovation and diffusion is no longer tenable, the two are inseparable and mutually reinforcing and this is one of the key sources of density dependence in the evolutionary competitive process."
Außerdem nette evolutionäre Kritik und Klarstellung des Gleichgewichtsbegriffs:
S. 935: "Of course, economic systems must be co-ordinated if they are to function [...] [b]ut co-ordination is not equilibirium in a broader sense, the absence of any internal tendency to change. Indeed, the incessant tendency to redefine itself from within is without question a central feature of modern capitalism. This is one reason why the evolutionary economics tradition pays more than lip service to the work of Schumpeter, who with his concept of creative destruction, encapsulated perfectly the inherent restlessness of a capitalist economy."
